Home About Us Government Relations and Advocacy Media Contact Us Site Map Privacy Français  
Multiple Sclerosis Society of CanadaSociété canadienne de la sclérose en plaquesfinding a cure - enhancing quality of life
Multiple Sclerosis Living with Multiple Sclerosis Treatments Donate Now Get Involved Special Events

 

News in Research

Research We Fund

Research Explained

Take Part in Research

Apply for a Research Grant

Search Research

Donate Now to Research


Research Home

Helpful links:

Stem Cell Research

MS Scientific Research Foundation

Research Summaries

MS Research Accomplishments



Research
  Small FontMedium FontLarge Font

Research News from ACTRIMS – Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, October 3, 2004

The ninth annual meeting of the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) focused on progress being made in MS research. The day-long program enabled nearly 200 specialist physicians, basic scientists and clinical investigators to exchange a wide variety of information and discuss research findings in order to speed the pace of scientific discovery and improve care for people with MS.

This year’s meeting of ACTRIMS was held in Toronto on October 3, immediately preceding the American Neurological Association's annual conference. The meeting was chaired by Dr. Jerry S. Wolinsky and jointly sponsored by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) and the University of Maryland School of Medicine, in collaboration with the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada.

Following are highlights from the ACTRIMS 2004 program. In addition, the abstracts are posted on the ACTRIMS website. (English only)

Ethical Issues in MS Clinical Trials

In the keynote address, National MS Society Chief Medical Officer Dr. Aaron Miller (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY) discussed the ethics of testing MS drugs against inactive placebo. In placebo-controlled studies, an inactive placebo is administered to a “control” group to compare against the benefits and liabilities of a test drug, while keeping as much as possible about treatment administration and monitoring “common” between the active and placebo groups. These studies are widely acknowledged as the most efficient, cost effective, and decisive means of testing the safety and effectiveness of a therapy.

However, since the approval of the first treatment for relapsing forms of MS in 1993, and with the approval of additional agents in subsequent years, debate has been ongoing about whether placebo-controlled trials are still ethical and practical in people who have forms of MS for which there are approved treatments.

Dr. Miller cited the conclusions of a National MS Society Task Force in 2001 that placebo-controlled studies are only ethical for 1) forms of MS where treatments are widely available but the participants have actively declined the use of those treatments; or 2) for individuals who have forms of MS for which there are no approved or available treatments. These circumstances can make recruitment for clinical trials very difficult.

Dr. Miller noted some options to placebo-controlled studies, such as using other drugs as controls, or studying drugs in combinations with approved agents. “The desire to achieve better treatment for MS is strong, yet the ethical requirement for the protection of individuals remains paramount,” said Dr. Miller. He noted in conclusion that a major step in addressing these issues will be taken when the National MS Society convenes a workshop on this and other topics related to clinical trials in MS in December 2004.

Multiple Sclerosis Pathological Subtypes

Much work is taking place in laboratories around the world to study the pathological subtypes of MS. If the reasons for these differences can be determined, this is the case, then therapies might be better targeted based on the subtype. Four leading researchers reported on progress to date.

MS Lesion Project Update
Dr. Claudia Lucchinetti (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn) presented an update of the National MS Society-funded MS Lesion Project, an international collaborative effort to determine how clinical symptoms, imaging findings, and pathology correlate in people with MS. To date, tissue samples have enabled the group to classify 286 people with MS as having one of four patterns of lesions (areas of damage to nerve-insulating myelin), each pattern appearing to have different causes of destruction. Dr. Lucchinetti reported that the pathology of several severe diseases similar to MS – neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and Balo’s concentric sclerosis – correlate with specific lesion patterns, and the team found a molecule in the blood that reliably distinguished NMO from MS. These findings, which are to be published in an upcoming issue of the scientific journal Lancet, further confirm the ability of this extensive project to improve the diagnosis and treatment of MS.

Immunology Correlates of MS Subtypes
Dr. Richard Ransohoff (Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio) reported on a project which examined the immunology of lesion patterns described by Dr. Lucchinetti. The research group have focused in particular on patterns two and three which were found in 84% of people with MS in the study. The work looked at the expression of chemokines, substances that have a well-known role in inflammation within the immune system. They found that although there are similarities in immune function between pattern one and three, there are also striking differences. This research supports the theory of different lesion patterns in their immunology as well as in pathology, imaging results and clinical symptoms.

MRI Correlates
Dr. Wayne Moore (University of British Columbia) reported on several non-standard MRI techniques that are promising to yield greater information about how and why MS lesions develop. Dr. Moore’s research is supported by the MS Society of Canada. For example, magnetic spectroscopy (MRS) can measure biochemical markers and is useful for determining damage to axons (nerve fibres) in the MS process. He also reported on work using another technique called diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) which is being used to study so-called normal appearing white matter in which standard MRI has not found MS lesions. The research group has found by using DWI they can detect abnormalities including both myelin and axonal loss. By examining early damage, the researchers hope to learn more about how MS progresses.

Significance of Pathologic Classification Systems
Dr. Samuel Ludwin (Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont.) addressed the question of the usefulness of developing pathologic classifications systems for MS lesions. He noted that in recent years it has become clear that most pathological classifications have concentrated on the acuity of the process. Although the efforts by Dr. Lucchinetti and her colleagues represented the first real attempt to develop a classification system based on pathogenesis, there is a real need for classifications based on real time imaging studies with pathological confirmation. Such classifications would also have to go beyond descriptions of demyelination and inflammation. They must take into consideration the degree of axonal damage, and damage to the normal appearing white matter and cortex, in order to be of use clinically, predictively and therapeutically.

Tracking Nerve Stem Cells

Dr. Jeff Bulte (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore) is testing the capabilities of nerve stem cells (immature cells capable of forming brain cells) using a cutting-edge, non-invasive method, with funding from a National MS Society Pilot Research Award and a grant from the National Institutes of Health. His team labelled mouse brain cells with a magnetic probe, then injected them into the brains of mice with the MS-like disease EAE, and tracked them using magnetic resonance imaging. Dr. Bulte reported further on results originally presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Neurology in the spring of 2004, noting that most movement or migration of the injected cells occurred early during active disease, and greater migration occurred when disease was more severe. This study provides important data on the timing of such cell replacement therapies, and on the capabilities of cells to migrate to areas of damage. Much further study is necessary in such models before human trials can be undertaken.

Results Presented from Phase Two Fampridine Study

Dr. Andrew Goodman (University of Rochester, NY) and colleagues reported the results of a study of fampridine-SR (a slow-release formula of 4-aminopyridine being developed by Acorda Therapeutics) to treat MS symptoms. Fampridine-SR blocks tiny pores, or potassium channels, on the surface of nerve fibres, and thus may improve the conduction of nerve signals in nerve fibres whose myelin coating has been damaged by MS. In a double-blinded placebo-controlled dosing study, 206 people with MS were randomized to receive either fampridine 10 mg, 15 mg, or 20 mg, or inactive placebo for 12 weeks. The results indicate a trend (an effect which does not quite reach statistical significance) toward improved walking speed in the fampridine groups, and a significant increase in leg strength. Side effects included dizziness, insomnia and nausea, with two people in the 20-mg group having seizures (one from an accidental overdose). Further study is needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of this drug for MS.

Oral Pirfenidone for Secondary-Progressive MS (Poster presentation)

Dr. Jonathan Walker and colleagues (University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine) tested the safety and effectiveness of the experimental, oral drug pirfenidone in a small number of people with secondary-progressive MS. Among its actions, pirfenidone inhibits the immune messenger protein TNF-alpha. Twenty-five people were administered this drug and 18 others took inactive placebo; 16 of 25 treated patients and 11 of 18 placebo patients continued the regimen for 12 months. There was a reduced incidence of relapses in the pirfenidone group (12.5%) compared with the placebo group (45.5%). Those taking pirfenidone had significantly higher scores on a scale rating neurological function, as well as improved bladder function. Further study of the drug is warranted to determine its safety and effectiveness in MS.

Conserving Energy to Battle Fatigue (Poster presentation)

Dr. Virgil Mathiowetz and colleagues (University of Minnesota, Minn.) evaluated a six-week energy conservation course as a strategy for combating fatigue, with funding from the National MS Society. This course, taught by an occupational therapist, involves effort-saving devices, eliminating or delegating tiring tasks, and including rest periods into every day. A total of 169 people with MS were randomly assigned to the course or a control group. Using scales to measure the impact of the course, the investigators found significant improvements in fatigue, self-efficacy, and some aspects of quality of life in those who took the course. This study is helping to identify simple energy-saving strategies to enable people with MS to manage fatigue.

A Clue to MS Progression? (Poster presentation)

Dr. William T. Regenold (University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore) and colleagues investigated whether the appearance of glucose, a sugar, in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is associated with MS progression. With funding from the Pilot Research Award Program of the National MS Society, they measured the concentration of several molecules in CSF samples from 50 people with relapsing-remitting MS, 50 people with secondary-progressive MS, and 12 people without MS. People with both types of MS had significantly higher levels of sorbitol and lactate than controls without MS, and people with secondary-progressive MS had significantly higher levels of glucose and lactate than those with relapsing-remitting disease. These results indicate that there may be differences in glucose metabolism in MS, and differences between people with different types of disease as well, but further study is warranted to determine an association between the findings and the cause of MS progression.

(With information from the National MS Society [USA])

Disclaimer
The Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada is an independent, voluntary health agency and does not approve, endorse or recommend any specific product or therapy but provides information to assist individuals in making their own decisions.

line
 
Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
Toll free to reach the nearest regional office: 1 800 268-7582

To locate the MS Society office near you, please select your region:

E-mail: info@mssociety.ca
(Please provide your town and province in your e-mail)

Multiple Sclerosis   Living with MS   Research   Treatments   Donate Now   Get Involved    Special Events

Home    About Us    Advocacy    Media    Contact Us    Site Map    Privacy    Français